Home / Compare
Compare

Routers save tokens. We save tokens and guard the bill.

Plenty of tools can fan out to multiple models. Very few treat cost governance and data trust as first-class alongside routing. Here's the honest landscape against the tools teams actually evaluate.

CapabilityNeuroRouteRouteLLMOpenRouterLiteLLMPortkey
Multi-provider from one APIYesPartialYesYesYes
Automatic cost-based routingYesYesPartialPartialPartial
Task-aware, quality-bar routingYesPartialPartial
Learns from your own feedbackYesPartial
Auto-escalates on empty/failed responsesYesPartialPartialPartial
Keep your own keys (BYOK)YesYesPartialYesYes
Per-key + org $ spend quotasYesPartialYesYes
Input-token compressionYes
Semantic + prompt cachingYesPartialPartialYes
PII detection & routing policyYesPartialPartial
Input & output guardrailsYesPartialYes
Request-log search + OpenTelemetryYesPartialYesYes
SSO, workspaces & scoped keysYesPartialPartialYes
Multi-workspace membership & key assignmentYesN/APartialPartial
Per-member least-privilege scopingYesN/APartialPartial
Person + workspace-level audit trailYesN/APartialPartial
Provable zero-retention (per response)YesPartialPartialPartialPartial
Encryption at rest + CMEKYesN/APartialPartial
Crypto-shred erasure + GDPR exportYesPartial
MCP access (OAuth 2.1)Yes
Self-hosted models (vLLM)YesYesYesPartial
Per-request savings proofYesPartialPartialPartial
Transparent tier pricing, no % of savingsYesPartialPartialPartialPartial

RouteLLM (LMSYS) is an open-source strong/weak routing model; OpenRouter is a hosted multi-model aggregator; LiteLLM is an open-source multi-provider proxy with budgets & caching; Portkey is a commercial AI gateway with guardrails. All are capable tools — this reflects out-of-the-box capability as commonly deployed and will vary by version and configuration. Corrections welcome.

Read the full comparisons

← Back to home · Pricing · Blog